“RMV White Elephant” or, why two ships are better than one

23/11/09

Cornwall Council has been telling us for a while that there isn’t time to review their choice of a single ship, but the Council of the Isles of Scilly is now saying that a faster ship operating out of Falmouth might suit them better. Falmouth is not an option, but if there’s time to reopen the choice of ship, then we should do so, because two ships would be better than one for Penzance.

The Friends of Penzance Harbour have always disagreed with the decision to change from the current separate passenger and freight ships to a larger single combined vessel. The reasons for this are described in detail in the “RMV White Elephant” document below, but the main points are as follows:

• It risks putting the local Dry Dock permanently out of business, with consequent loss of at least 40 local jobs. At the moment the Scilly Link vessels are an important customer for the Dry Dock. The new vessel will not fit and will have to be dry-docked elsewhere.
• A single combined vessel will be slow and do nothing to encourage day trips to the Scillies, which is an important attraction for visitors staying in Penzance.
• With passengers and freight travelling on the same vessel the sailing times and port operations cannot be optimised for either passengers or freight, resulting in health & safety issues, a poor quality service, and missed opportunities for integration with bus and train services.
• With just one ship operating all year round the service is vulnerable to unexpected breakdown, as happened in the summer of 2008 when the Gry Maritha was out of service for several weeks.
• Cornwall Council claims that the larger vessel will require an expensive pier extension and ugly rock armouring to the historic Lighthouse Pier. And it will still have to use Albert Pier in bad weather, which will result in the loss of valuable small craft moorings.
• With a traditional combined passenger and freight vessel there is a risk that a competing operator with a fast ferry could enter the market, cream off the summer day-tripper trade, and leave the Council-subsidised operation running at a loss with council tax-payers picking up the tab.

The capital cost of a two ship approach need be no greater than the planned single combined passenger and freight ship and could be substantially less. The operating cost of a two ship system will also be less. This is because fuel, crew and insurance costs are all significantly higher for a passenger ship than a cargo ship, but with two ships the passenger ship will be laid up in winter, which cuts the cost of the operation dramatically.

In short, the choice of a single larger combined passenger and freight vessel is bad for the fabric of the historic pier, bad for customers of the service, a serious threat to local jobs and a potential source of council tax rises.

If there is time to review the ship choice then we certainly should!

RMV White Elephant : download pdf | view pdf

Other Stories

20/8/10
Andrew George condemns Option A and the "bullying and intimidation" of its supporters

19/8/10
Secretary of State declines to call in LBC application

11/8/10
Joint appeal for DfT investigation of Route Partnership project

6/8/10
Planning committee chair describes Penzance Harbour process as “absolute shambles”

16/7/10
European Parliament to investigate Pz Harbour scheme

12/7/10
URGENT: Please write to Norman Baker MP

28/6/10
South Pier historic listing elevated to Grade II *

23/6/10
Cllr Hicks guilty of “unreasonable and excessive personal attack”

14/6/10
Golden opportunity to reassess Scilly Link scheme

9/5/10
Tender outcome predictable

4/5/10
Vote to save historic seafront

24/3/10
Object to Option A environment consents

20/3/10
Help us secure a Public Inquiry

17/3/10
Option PZ planning application submitted

9/3/10
Misinformation, threats and false promises win the day

9/3/10
Objectors win letters battle hands down

8/3/10
Planning Committee volt face

7/3/10
Option A support so much “smoke & mirrors”

4/3/10
Public give Option PZ a warm welcome

3/3/10
CPRE object to LBC application for Option A

1/3/10
Town Council rejects Option A again

25/2/10
“Option PZ” should unite community

5/3/10
Planners meet this coming Monday

24/2/10
Put Penzance First

24/2/10
Option A Myths

22/2/10
Council harbour decision making "grossly defective"

8/2/10
Council resubmit application for Listed Building Consent

28/1/10
A sad day for Cornwall Council

25/1/10
English Heritage objection to Option A “still stands”

22/1/10
MP convenes meeting to discuss alternatives to Option A

13/1/10
Business community calls for end to Option A plans - now 30 sign-ons

1/1/10
Campaign continues in 2010

14/12/09
Planning Committee REFUSES application - 669 write to object

10/12/09
Packed meeting sends clear message to planning committee

2/12/09
English Heritage say NO to building on Battery Rocks beach

30/11/09
Planning Committee to meet in Penzance on December 10th & 14th

23/11/09
“RMV White Elephant” or, why two ships are better than one

19/11/09
Deadline for objections extended

16/11/09
Out of control Council circumvents normal planning procedures, makes mockery of local democracy

14/11/09
Friends ask Secretary of State to “call in” harbour proposals

13/11/09
Packed house hears extraordinary history of pier

12/11/09
Tinner Challenges Planners

2/11/09
Complaint of maladministration leading to injustice

28/10/09
New Option A planning applications submitted - YOU MUST OBJECT AGAIN!

22/10/09
Option A: two years of hell!

16/10/09
Isles Council continues its bully-boy tactics

9/10/09
Packed public meeting rejects plan to build on Battery Rocks beach

7/10/09
New planning battle kicks off

1/10/09
Offensive remarks a sign of poor judgement

30/9/09
Public Meeting: St John’s Hall, October 9th at 7:30pm

29/9/09
Friends launch Fighting Fund to defend historic seafront

28/9/09
Cornwall Cabinet decision based on biased and misleading information

13/9/09
Cabinet to consider resubmission of Battery Rocks planning application

11/9/09
One ship option is NOT cheaper to operate

25/8/09
Alternative options report fudges figures to support original scheme

25/8/09
MP says Route Partnership scheme "politically undeliverable"

24/8/09
Route Partnership plan will harm regeneration in Penzance

20/8/09
Public rejects Route Partnership scheme (AGAIN)

12/8/09
A reminder of what we stand for...

30/7/09
Scilly Link unviable from Falmouth

27/7/09
Route Partnership attempt to undermine local democracy - historic seafront still in danger!

7/7/09
Route Partnership continue to promote development on Battery Rocks beach

6/7/09
Meadery site "may" be best option for passenger terminal

5/7/09
Friends comment on draft Alternative Options Appraisal

3/7/09
Breakdown of objections published

12/6/09
Planning application withdrawn

19/5/09
Cornwall Council move to consider alternatives

4/5/09
Route Partnership talk about alternatives

1/5/09
Jubilee Pool association joins fight against harbour development

22/4/09
Planners overwhelmed by objections to Route Partnership plan

22/4/09
Planning permission sought for works depot

15/4/09
Time to talk about alternatives

9/4/09
Planning application to be considered on July 7th

26/3/09
Objections still accepted

16/3/09
Object now to stop Battery Rocks beach development

10/3/09
English Heritage unhappy with Route Partnership scheme

5/3/09
Harbour development planning notices published today

4/3/09
Route Partnership admits to exhibition photomontage error

3/3/09
Route Partnership refuses to meet protesters

2/3/09
Traffic survey reveals advantages of out-of-town freight depot

25/2/09
Route Partnership defy public and submit Battery Rocks planning application

23/2/09
Department of Transport request review of Route Partnership plans

19/2/09
Friends of Penzance Harbour call on Councils to provide political leadership

16/2/09
Call for Scillonians to look again at Route Partnership plans for the Islands

11/2/09
Town Council says "no" to Route Partnership scheme

10/2/09
Elected representatives must reject Route Partnership plan for Penzance

5/2/09
Department of Transport admit there is NO time limit on funding

26/1/09
Friends of Penzance Harbour make formal complaint about exhibition

23/1/09
Massive opposition to plans for Penzance harbour