Out of control Council circumvents normal planning procedures, makes mockery of local democracy

16/11/09

The new unitary Cornwall Council has decided that elected local members will not be allowed to review the Council’s own planning applications for a hugely controversial development on Battery Rocks beach in Penzance.

Officers at Cornwall Council have ignored the views of the chair and vice-chair of the West Area Planning Committee and for the first time have chosen to send planning applications directly to the Strategic Planning Committee. Previously applications were referred to Strategic from an Area Planning Committee. Members local to the Penzance area make up half the 12 members on the West Area Planning Committee but only two members from the Penzance area are on the 21 member Strategic Planning Committee.

The issues to do with a listed building and the sea wall are by no means strategic. They are to do with local arrangements for the Isles of Scilly Link, not with whether there should be such a project. The choice of how the local facilities in Penzance Harbour should be improved is a decision that should be taken locally.

The effect of the move is to disenfranchise the Council members representing those most directly affected by the scheme, and sidestep massive public opposition to the plans.

This is just the most recent in a series of initiatives by Cornwall Council to circumvent normal planning procedures and controls and to remove elected local representatives and their constituents from the decision making process. First the consultation process ignored the clearly stated wishes of local people, then the Council decided that it didn’t need to apply for planning permission for most of the works, and now it has decided that the planning consents that are required will not be scrutinised by local members. On top of this the Council says that the final decision about whether to build on Battery Rocks beach or go for alternatives will be taken by the Cabinet of the Council, where Penzance, one of the largest towns in the County, and its surrounding area has no representation!

The decision comes just days after Penzance residents were presented with the findings of the Penzance Harbour South Pier “Historic Building Analysis”, and told that the pier is one of the most important historic structures in Cornwall and that the parts of the pier that will be permanently buried by the development are the most sensitive historically. The author of the report, Nick Cahill, recommends that the pier’s listing be upgraded to “at least Grade II*”, placing the pier amongst the top 8% of all historic structures in the UK.

FoPzH News Release on this issue : download pdf | view pdf

Other Stories

20/8/10
Andrew George condemns Option A and the "bullying and intimidation" of its supporters

19/8/10
Secretary of State declines to call in LBC application

11/8/10
Joint appeal for DfT investigation of Route Partnership project

6/8/10
Planning committee chair describes Penzance Harbour process as “absolute shambles”

16/7/10
European Parliament to investigate Pz Harbour scheme

12/7/10
URGENT: Please write to Norman Baker MP

28/6/10
South Pier historic listing elevated to Grade II *

23/6/10
Cllr Hicks guilty of “unreasonable and excessive personal attack”

14/6/10
Golden opportunity to reassess Scilly Link scheme

9/5/10
Tender outcome predictable

4/5/10
Vote to save historic seafront

24/3/10
Object to Option A environment consents

20/3/10
Help us secure a Public Inquiry

17/3/10
Option PZ planning application submitted

9/3/10
Misinformation, threats and false promises win the day

9/3/10
Objectors win letters battle hands down

8/3/10
Planning Committee volt face

7/3/10
Option A support so much “smoke & mirrors”

4/3/10
Public give Option PZ a warm welcome

3/3/10
CPRE object to LBC application for Option A

1/3/10
Town Council rejects Option A again

25/2/10
“Option PZ” should unite community

5/3/10
Planners meet this coming Monday

24/2/10
Put Penzance First

24/2/10
Option A Myths

22/2/10
Council harbour decision making "grossly defective"

8/2/10
Council resubmit application for Listed Building Consent

28/1/10
A sad day for Cornwall Council

25/1/10
English Heritage objection to Option A “still stands”

22/1/10
MP convenes meeting to discuss alternatives to Option A

13/1/10
Business community calls for end to Option A plans - now 30 sign-ons

1/1/10
Campaign continues in 2010

14/12/09
Planning Committee REFUSES application - 669 write to object

10/12/09
Packed meeting sends clear message to planning committee

2/12/09
English Heritage say NO to building on Battery Rocks beach

30/11/09
Planning Committee to meet in Penzance on December 10th & 14th

23/11/09
“RMV White Elephant” or, why two ships are better than one

19/11/09
Deadline for objections extended

16/11/09
Out of control Council circumvents normal planning procedures, makes mockery of local democracy

14/11/09
Friends ask Secretary of State to “call in” harbour proposals

13/11/09
Packed house hears extraordinary history of pier

12/11/09
Tinner Challenges Planners

2/11/09
Complaint of maladministration leading to injustice

28/10/09
New Option A planning applications submitted - YOU MUST OBJECT AGAIN!

22/10/09
Option A: two years of hell!

16/10/09
Isles Council continues its bully-boy tactics

9/10/09
Packed public meeting rejects plan to build on Battery Rocks beach

7/10/09
New planning battle kicks off

1/10/09
Offensive remarks a sign of poor judgement

30/9/09
Public Meeting: St John’s Hall, October 9th at 7:30pm

29/9/09
Friends launch Fighting Fund to defend historic seafront

28/9/09
Cornwall Cabinet decision based on biased and misleading information

13/9/09
Cabinet to consider resubmission of Battery Rocks planning application

11/9/09
One ship option is NOT cheaper to operate

25/8/09
Alternative options report fudges figures to support original scheme

25/8/09
MP says Route Partnership scheme "politically undeliverable"

24/8/09
Route Partnership plan will harm regeneration in Penzance

20/8/09
Public rejects Route Partnership scheme (AGAIN)

12/8/09
A reminder of what we stand for...

30/7/09
Scilly Link unviable from Falmouth

27/7/09
Route Partnership attempt to undermine local democracy - historic seafront still in danger!

7/7/09
Route Partnership continue to promote development on Battery Rocks beach

6/7/09
Meadery site "may" be best option for passenger terminal

5/7/09
Friends comment on draft Alternative Options Appraisal

3/7/09
Breakdown of objections published

12/6/09
Planning application withdrawn

19/5/09
Cornwall Council move to consider alternatives

4/5/09
Route Partnership talk about alternatives

1/5/09
Jubilee Pool association joins fight against harbour development

22/4/09
Planners overwhelmed by objections to Route Partnership plan

22/4/09
Planning permission sought for works depot

15/4/09
Time to talk about alternatives

9/4/09
Planning application to be considered on July 7th

26/3/09
Objections still accepted

16/3/09
Object now to stop Battery Rocks beach development

10/3/09
English Heritage unhappy with Route Partnership scheme

5/3/09
Harbour development planning notices published today

4/3/09
Route Partnership admits to exhibition photomontage error

3/3/09
Route Partnership refuses to meet protesters

2/3/09
Traffic survey reveals advantages of out-of-town freight depot

25/2/09
Route Partnership defy public and submit Battery Rocks planning application

23/2/09
Department of Transport request review of Route Partnership plans

19/2/09
Friends of Penzance Harbour call on Councils to provide political leadership

16/2/09
Call for Scillonians to look again at Route Partnership plans for the Islands

11/2/09
Town Council says "no" to Route Partnership scheme

10/2/09
Elected representatives must reject Route Partnership plan for Penzance

5/2/09
Department of Transport admit there is NO time limit on funding

26/1/09
Friends of Penzance Harbour make formal complaint about exhibition

23/1/09
Massive opposition to plans for Penzance harbour