Call for Scillonians to look again at Route Partnership plans for the Islands

16/2/09

The Friends of Penzance Harbour have written to the inhabitants of the Isles of Scilly highlighting their concerns about the Route Partnership's plans for Penzance and suggesting that Scillonians too should take time to make sure that what is being planned for Scilly is really in the best interests of the Islands.

"The most controversial aspect of the scheme is the creation of a passenger terminal, freight depot, and lorry parking and turning space on a prominent beach and waterfront location between the Lighthouse Pier and the Jubilee Pool. This is perhaps the prettiest and historically most important part of Penzance and not the place for an industrial estate-style development of this kind. The scheme also includes plans to lengthen and disfigure the listed Lighthouse Pier to accommodate a longer new Scillonian.

"As an alternative to this we would like to see the creation of an out-of-town freight handling depot with containerised freight brought to the harbour each day for immediate loading onto the ship. Apart from removing the need to concrete over 5000 square meters of beach and foreshore between the Lighthouse Pier and Jubilee Pool, Cornwall County Council traffic surveys indicate that this would remove between 200 and 250 freight-related vehicle movements from the harbour area for every freight sailing to the Scillies; containers would be brought from the depot to the ship in just 3-4 lorry movements. The passenger terminal, which takes up only a small part of the reclaimed land, could then be built on an existing harbour side site. By their own admission this is an approach that the Route Partnership have not considered.

"While we have looked at this approach from the perspective of Penzance, its historic waterfront and heavily congested harbour area, we think it might also carry advantages for Hugh Town and the Scillies. In particular, if freight arrived in the Scillies in containers those containers could be transferred to a site away from the harbour area for unpacking and distribution, removing the need for a large freight shed on a prominent and sensitive waterside site. As with Penzance this would reduce traffic congestion and more effectively separate passengers from freight. Containerisation would also mean a better quality freight service with goods no-longer exposed to the elements during loading and unloading of the ship.

"We also have doubts about the replacement of the existing two ship operation with a single larger combined freight and passenger vessel. Apart from requiring the lengthening of Penzance’s listed Lighthouse Pier and the loss of a number of small -craft moorings adjacent to the new vessel’s storm berth on the Albert Pier, this approach seems to fly in the face of operational logic. A two ship operation much more effectively separates freight and passengers on the quays, it allows sailing times to suit the different needs of freight and passengers (freight can arrive in Scilly early enough to be off the quays before they get busy with visitors), and it avoids the cost of pushing an expensive passenger ship back and forward to the Scillies all winter long with no passengers on it. The proposed single new combined vessel will be expensive to build and more costly to run and maintain, all things that will impact on freight charges. Winter operation of the passenger vessel will also dramatically reduce its design life, and with one ship instead of two the danger of mechanical failure or other incident leading to the absence of a sea link to the mainland is also greater. Since the new ship will be too big to be dry-docked in Penzance the chance of affecting a swift mid-season repair will also be reduced. It has also been suggested that if the new vessel was a passenger-only one it might be faster with a reduction in journey times boosting day-visitors to the Islands.

"The Department of Transport have recently confirmed that the funding earmarked for the harbour improvements in Penzance and Scilly is not in jeopardy if the people who are to be affected by the developments need more time to consider alternatives and get the scheme right. The people of Penzance would certainly like that time. We believe that a number of questions about what is being planned remain unanswered, and that less destructive alternatives, including the out-of-town freight depot approach, should be properly considered. While we review the possibilities for Penzance, perhaps Scillonians might also take the opportunity to spend a little extra time to make sure that what is being planned for Scilly is really in the best interests of the Islands.

Full text of the open letter to Scillonians : download pdf | view pdf

Cornishman article.

Other Stories

20/8/10
Andrew George condemns Option A and the "bullying and intimidation" of its supporters

19/8/10
Secretary of State declines to call in LBC application

11/8/10
Joint appeal for DfT investigation of Route Partnership project

6/8/10
Planning committee chair describes Penzance Harbour process as “absolute shambles”

16/7/10
European Parliament to investigate Pz Harbour scheme

12/7/10
URGENT: Please write to Norman Baker MP

28/6/10
South Pier historic listing elevated to Grade II *

23/6/10
Cllr Hicks guilty of “unreasonable and excessive personal attack”

14/6/10
Golden opportunity to reassess Scilly Link scheme

9/5/10
Tender outcome predictable

4/5/10
Vote to save historic seafront

24/3/10
Object to Option A environment consents

20/3/10
Help us secure a Public Inquiry

17/3/10
Option PZ planning application submitted

9/3/10
Misinformation, threats and false promises win the day

9/3/10
Objectors win letters battle hands down

8/3/10
Planning Committee volt face

7/3/10
Option A support so much “smoke & mirrors”

4/3/10
Public give Option PZ a warm welcome

3/3/10
CPRE object to LBC application for Option A

1/3/10
Town Council rejects Option A again

25/2/10
“Option PZ” should unite community

5/3/10
Planners meet this coming Monday

24/2/10
Put Penzance First

24/2/10
Option A Myths

22/2/10
Council harbour decision making "grossly defective"

8/2/10
Council resubmit application for Listed Building Consent

28/1/10
A sad day for Cornwall Council

25/1/10
English Heritage objection to Option A “still stands”

22/1/10
MP convenes meeting to discuss alternatives to Option A

13/1/10
Business community calls for end to Option A plans - now 30 sign-ons

1/1/10
Campaign continues in 2010

14/12/09
Planning Committee REFUSES application - 669 write to object

10/12/09
Packed meeting sends clear message to planning committee

2/12/09
English Heritage say NO to building on Battery Rocks beach

30/11/09
Planning Committee to meet in Penzance on December 10th & 14th

23/11/09
“RMV White Elephant” or, why two ships are better than one

19/11/09
Deadline for objections extended

16/11/09
Out of control Council circumvents normal planning procedures, makes mockery of local democracy

14/11/09
Friends ask Secretary of State to “call in” harbour proposals

13/11/09
Packed house hears extraordinary history of pier

12/11/09
Tinner Challenges Planners

2/11/09
Complaint of maladministration leading to injustice

28/10/09
New Option A planning applications submitted - YOU MUST OBJECT AGAIN!

22/10/09
Option A: two years of hell!

16/10/09
Isles Council continues its bully-boy tactics

9/10/09
Packed public meeting rejects plan to build on Battery Rocks beach

7/10/09
New planning battle kicks off

1/10/09
Offensive remarks a sign of poor judgement

30/9/09
Public Meeting: St John’s Hall, October 9th at 7:30pm

29/9/09
Friends launch Fighting Fund to defend historic seafront

28/9/09
Cornwall Cabinet decision based on biased and misleading information

13/9/09
Cabinet to consider resubmission of Battery Rocks planning application

11/9/09
One ship option is NOT cheaper to operate

25/8/09
Alternative options report fudges figures to support original scheme

25/8/09
MP says Route Partnership scheme "politically undeliverable"

24/8/09
Route Partnership plan will harm regeneration in Penzance

20/8/09
Public rejects Route Partnership scheme (AGAIN)

12/8/09
A reminder of what we stand for...

30/7/09
Scilly Link unviable from Falmouth

27/7/09
Route Partnership attempt to undermine local democracy - historic seafront still in danger!

7/7/09
Route Partnership continue to promote development on Battery Rocks beach

6/7/09
Meadery site "may" be best option for passenger terminal

5/7/09
Friends comment on draft Alternative Options Appraisal

3/7/09
Breakdown of objections published

12/6/09
Planning application withdrawn

19/5/09
Cornwall Council move to consider alternatives

4/5/09
Route Partnership talk about alternatives

1/5/09
Jubilee Pool association joins fight against harbour development

22/4/09
Planners overwhelmed by objections to Route Partnership plan

22/4/09
Planning permission sought for works depot

15/4/09
Time to talk about alternatives

9/4/09
Planning application to be considered on July 7th

26/3/09
Objections still accepted

16/3/09
Object now to stop Battery Rocks beach development

10/3/09
English Heritage unhappy with Route Partnership scheme

5/3/09
Harbour development planning notices published today

4/3/09
Route Partnership admits to exhibition photomontage error

3/3/09
Route Partnership refuses to meet protesters

2/3/09
Traffic survey reveals advantages of out-of-town freight depot

25/2/09
Route Partnership defy public and submit Battery Rocks planning application

23/2/09
Department of Transport request review of Route Partnership plans

19/2/09
Friends of Penzance Harbour call on Councils to provide political leadership

16/2/09
Call for Scillonians to look again at Route Partnership plans for the Islands

11/2/09
Town Council says "no" to Route Partnership scheme

10/2/09
Elected representatives must reject Route Partnership plan for Penzance

5/2/09
Department of Transport admit there is NO time limit on funding

26/1/09
Friends of Penzance Harbour make formal complaint about exhibition

23/1/09
Massive opposition to plans for Penzance harbour